In this issue

Features

The magical mystery cure
Richard Shrubb reports on controversial trials using Class A drugs to treat depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Pre-trial therapy
Peter Jenkins outlines the reforms needed to ensure witnesses and victims of crime have access to expert pre-trial therapy.

Working with cult survivors
Gillie Jenkinson reveals how cults take over their members’ minds and lives.

When parents aren’t good-enough
Joanna North explores how therapists can help children process the knowledge that their parents couldn’t look after them.

Research in practice
Joe Armstrong, Amanda Hawkins and Mhairi Thurston discuss the benefits for counselling of practice research networks.

Regulars

In practice
Rachel Freeth: Fixing to facilitating

In the client's chair
Angela Smith: A fish out of water

In training
Mel Perry: Learning from my clients

The researcher
Barry McInnes: Compare the market

Talking point
Alain de Botton: Care for the soul

How I became a therapist
Eugene Ellis

Dilemmas
Transgender disclosure

The interview
Scott Miller: Excellence in therapy

Letters

BACP

From the chair
Amanda Hawkins: Direction of travel

Cover of Therapy Today, May 2013

Articles from this issue are not yet available online. Members and subscribers can download the pdf from the Therapy Today archive.

Editorial

I am grateful to Peter Jenkins for guiding us through the complex area of pre-trial therapy, an area that we will surely be hearing much more about given the number of arrests of ageing celebrities currently being made for historic sexual abuse following Operation Yewtree. As Peter explains, pre-trial therapy is viewed in the criminal justice system as problematic because of its potential to ‘contaminate’ evidence.

Despite there being clear guidance on pre-trial therapy for child and adult witnesses, in practice there seems to be much confusion about this. For example, in the recent tragic case of Frances Andrade who killed herself during the trial of her former music teacher, Andrade was allegedly warned by the police against having therapy even though she was clearly a reluctant and vulnerable witness – her husband has said that she had been completely distraught at the idea of the past being churned up. 

In many cases, Peter writes, there is a lack of awareness even among therapists as to the specific requirements of pre-trial therapy. One mother of a six-year-old boy who was having nightmares and trouble sleeping was told by the police that her son could have counselling if he was really ‘falling apart’ prior to the trial. When she tried to engage a counsellor to work with him, however, they all refused saying that the police would not like it.

From the therapist’s point of view there is the legal context of the therapy to consider, not least the issue of confidentiality – or, rather, the lack of it. Not only may the police and Crown Prosecution Service need to be kept closely informed but both the prosecution and defence solicitors have access to the therapist’s records. However difficult and alien this work may be to counsellors, it would seem also to be terribly important if the voices of victims are to come to the fore.

Sarah Browne
Editor